|

|
The Birth Trauma and Inner Divinity
Asha Clinton, MSW, PhD
The younger a child, the more intensely people seem drawn to him. He seems
to have a magnetism that is not reported in the psychological literature, but
that is often commented on by parents. I have heard many say that, just having
been born, their infant is still very close to God and the experience of being an
unembodied soul. These parents sense a particular spiritual quality in young
children, a sacredness that surrounds them and gradually leaves most of them
as they grow up and experience the world.
What makes that magnetism disappear? Let's list some of every child's
needs, desires, rights, and freedoms that are most often unseen by parents
and
therefore not bestowed: appropriate physical affection and protection;
emotional support, comfort, appreciation, protection, witnessing, approval,
praise, affection, and love; a child's special desires that are often not honored
when they could be-- a certain Barbie or G. I. Joe, special time just with
Dad, baseball camp. Also, parents often don't appreciate the child's
value, inner
beauty, and positive qualities and gifts, or his natural human rights-- respect,
acceptance, honor, and equality. They often don't and can't vouchsafe the
child's freedom from of abuse, trauma, negativity, dysfunctional family
dynamics, and a traumatic social context. There's more, of course, but this
will serve as a start.
As you can see from this list, it is the impact of negative experience,
i.e., what I would call developmental trauma, that separates the child
from
his inborn
sacredness. That impact hits most strongly when parents don't see a child's
value, itself a primary trauma. To see a child fully means to be clear enough
in one's own psyche to see his need for all of the above (and more),
and to
provide it in good enough fashion, and to an appropriate degree.
I remember growing up around my Cousin Max, who was born 5 years after
me. His parents were middle class and provided all his physical needs,
but like
many of the children in Alice Miller's Drama of the Gifted Child (ftnt), he was
not seen; his parents saw, instead, his talent and potential. As a result, his
emotional needs were not met; his parents defined his value in terms of his
intelligence and potential to make money and rise in society, not his being;
they respected, accepted, loved, and honored his talent and his future, as they
fantasized it, not him. And not knowing they were part of a dysfunctional
family, they could hardly protect him from one.
The issue is not just whether the child is seen; it is also whether
the child is seen as a whole being rather than the part of the child
the parents value. And
from my perspective, a whole being is one in which the body, psyche,
and spirit are appropriately interconnected, and are all connected to
the directing
Center within the unconscious, which is, in turn, connected to the Divine.
Anything less than this is dissociation.
In ordinary life, especially in the West, we often tend toward the
categorization of things rather than the direct experience of them.
It is written into our cultures. We are often more interested in the
parts
than the whole.
Biological taxonomy is, to my mind, an excellent example of this. On
the basis of small differences in appearance-- and often few or none
in function--
different members of the plant or animal kingdom are assigned different
pigeonholes and names. Unconsciously, we divide and categorize almost
everything this way, even our children. In other words, our way of
dealing with human reality is often through pigeon-holing, splitting,
or dissociation.
For example, in our part of the world, God and the devil are split
from each
other, as are good and evil-- two sides of the SAME coin. White people
are good and black people are bad but, except for certain small physical
differences and
NO functional differences at all, they are exactly the same. People
above a certain income are one kind of people; people below that income
are
another
kind. I think you get the point: we react to the world from a dualistic,
traumatized perspective by splitting it into its parts.
The original trauma, as far as I can tell, is described in different
terms in different mythologies, so I will remind you of the one you may
know well--
Exodus. Before Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the tree of knowledge,
they were not separated from the Divine; rather they lived in His own
garden. They
were not even separate from each other since Eve was made of Adam's
rib. The Garden of Eden scenario, then, is one in which there is one
being and his
interconnected parts, including Adam and Eve.
Then, as the story goes in its many cross-cultural variants, something
happens-- what it is varies from culture to culture-- and God and humans
are no longer
united. The result is duality, the first great dissociative trauma.
Many more grow from this one.
Having grown up where we have, it is not surprising that most of
us have been dissociated from our own inner Divinity, from the fact
that, within us, there
remains, despite all attempts to ignore it and despite collective
dissociation, a shard of the original Divine spark which, if properly
fanned, allows union with
the Divine and an end to this most primary of dissociations-- Unity
instead of duality. The spark is, in various psychological, healing,
and spiritual modalities
and traditions, called the Center, the Higher Self, the Self, the
Core, the Atman, the Essence, the Divine Within.
The most profound trauma that most human beings suffer is being
plucked, as children, from direct experience of the Divine, and they
suffer it
at birth. For
the fetus growing within his mother, she is the Divine, providing,
as God did for Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, for his every
possible need. This is the
esoteric symbolic meaning of the birth trauma.
Since this level of the birth trauma is unrecognized and untreated
(and since the birth trauma is largely untreated on any level), it
is not surprising that the
most profound lack of mirroring children endure after their split
from Divinity is the lack of mirroring of that inner Divinity. Furthermore,
what is traumatized
in every form of child abuse, neglect, lack of mirroring, etc., is the child's
connection with his innate, essential Divinity, as if each trauma is another
spadeful of earth thrown on the inner diamond that makes it still harder to
find. I believe that this is the reason that wounds from lack of mirroring and
from trauma are often so deep.
Think of how you would treat the Christ, a being who is part Divine,
if he came to stay at your house: with respect, love, in fact, with every
quality in the list
in paragraph 2. This is what many of your clients have probably
not had themselves or given to their children-- the mirroring of their
Divinity so that it
is seen, respected, supported, witnessed, honored, accepted and,
most of all, loved. And doing all these things may be one of the greatest
gifts a therapist
(or human being) can convey. * (*ftnt: It is important not to
worship the Divinity in a child, since this leads inevitably to other
types of pathology.
Witness Jewish Princes, for example.)
How can we, as therapists,
take mirroring as deeply as it's needed, even to the depths of the
human Core? There is one requirement and two
types of work
that need to be done. The requirement is the same one that
inheres in any excellent psychotherapy: You can't take a client where
you haven't
been
yourself. The therapist will be able successfully to mirror
someone else's Center and heal the split he has with their inner Divinity
only
when she has already
reunited with her own. This is certainly necessary for every
therapist who wishes to clear the deeper levels of the birth trauma
in clients, as well as most
developmental traumas which lead to characterological and/or
dissociative symptoms.
The first level, then, is to mirror clients' inner Divinity
so he can heal from the trauma of not having had it acknowledged and
mirrored.
This is done by sitting
within one's own Center, and, from it, connecting intuitively
to the client's Center. Only then, when the therapist can sense what
that client's Center is
like and what qualities it has, can she begin to mirror it. This
level of the work takes a certain intuitive development which
tends to occur as the therapist sits
in her Center.
The second level is best accomplished with the energy psychotherapies,
particularly Seemorg Matrix Work. The latter can be used,
first, to discover and clear the Core Traumatic Patterns (give def)
which have broken the connection
between the conscious mind and Center. Next, it can be
used to clear individual traumas, especially, but not only, the birth
trauma. In clearing the
birth trauma, the therapist makes sure that she discovers
and
clears all the aspects of the birth trauma that need clearing
on the physical and
psychological levels, and then on the spiritual level as
well.
Afterward, it is possible to transform the negative Core Belief
Matrices related to these Core Traumatic Patterns and
traumas into positive ones. Finally, the
therapist can stimulate into development and activity
the positive
qualities which have been crushed by trauma or lain hidden
in the Center. In other
words, the energy psychotherapy component of working
with the Center is a large one, as important, in fact, as mirroring itself.
All the levels of traumatic abreaction can be cleared
while
the
therapist is
seeing and mirroring the client's Center. Slowly, the
connection between the client's conscious mind and Center reestablishes
itself. The client, perhaps
while meditating, suddenly hears the strong, peaceful
voice
of inner guidance within him; or he experiences, without precedent,
the deep ocean of
sweetness and love that is the Center. He begins to feel
a level of peace and contentment he has never before experienced. And
sometimes the therapist
can see a look of purity on the client's face, an inner
beauty
and light that bears no relation to his physical features,
although they somehow look
startlingly improved.
Next Article
© 1999 Nahoma Clinton. All Rights Reserved |